Wikipedia Calls on AI Giants to Pay for Data Usage: The Start of a New Digital Balance

In partnership with

Free email without sacrificing your privacy

Gmail is free, but you pay with your data. Proton Mail is different.

We don’t scan your messages. We don’t sell your behavior. We don’t follow you across the internet.

Proton Mail gives you full-featured, private email without surveillance or creepy profiling. It’s email that respects your time, your attention, and your boundaries.

Email doesn’t have to cost your privacy.

Ditch the Gmail data grab

In a significant development that could reshape the relationship between open-source platforms and artificial intelligence (AI) corporations, Wikipedia’s co-founder Jimmy Wales has called upon major technology companies such as Google and OpenAI to begin compensating the non-profit for their extensive use of its content in AI training. The move marks a crucial moment in the evolving debate over who should bear the financial burden for the data that fuels today’s most advanced AI systems.

Wikipedia’s Growing Burden in the AI Era

Wikipedia has long stood as one of the internet’s greatest open-access repositories of human knowledge. Since its founding in 2001, the platform has operated under a model that allows anyone to use, edit, and share information freely, with proper attribution. This open model has made Wikipedia one of the most visited websites in the world and a cornerstone of digital education and research.

However, as Wales pointed out in a recent interview with Reuters, the rise of AI models such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and other large language models (LLMs) has placed new kinds of stress on Wikipedia’s infrastructure. “We’re a big part of the training data for all the major LLMs,” Wales explained. “Everything in Wikipedia is freely licensed for people to do as they please with it. But on a more practical level, the AI bots crawling Wikipedia are imposing quite a lot of costs on us.”

The statement underscores a growing problem: while Wikipedia’s content is free to access, the massive automated scraping by AI systems consumes significant bandwidth and server resources — resources that are maintained entirely through public donations.

Why Wikipedia Wants AI Companies to Pay

Wales was careful to note that Wikipedia does not intend to abandon its open-access principles. Instead, he is advocating for AI companies to make use of Wikipedia Enterprise, a paid API designed to offer large-scale, structured access to its data. The initiative, launched in 2021, was aimed at organizations that need to query and process large amounts of Wikipedia data efficiently — a service already used by companies like Google for its Knowledge Panels.

“We’re trying to say, you should use our enterprise product and pay us for your usage,” Wales said. He emphasized that the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that operates Wikipedia, relies entirely on donations to fund its operations. These funds are meant to support free access for the general public, not to underwrite the costs of for-profit tech corporations. “It’s not really fair to our donors if people are donating to support Wikipedia, but then we’re spending that money to support OpenAI and Google and stuff like that,” he added.

Balancing Openness and Sustainability

One of the biggest challenges facing Wikipedia is how to balance its philosophy of open knowledge with the need for financial sustainability. When asked whether Wikipedia might consider blocking AI crawlers entirely, Wales admitted that the option is “possible but complicated.” Blocking AI bots would certainly reduce server strain, but it would also contradict Wikipedia’s core mission of providing open access to information.

“I’ve heard some rumblings,” he said, hinting at internal discussions within the Wikimedia Foundation about how to strike the right balance between openness and fairness. The dilemma reflects a broader tension in the digital world: how to maintain open platforms in an era when commercial entities increasingly rely on them for profit-driven ventures.

A Global Debate Over AI and Data Rights

Wikipedia’s call for compensation comes amid a global reckoning over how AI models obtain and use data. Over the past year, numerous publishers, news organizations, and creative industries have raised concerns about their copyrighted material being used without consent in AI training datasets. Legal battles have emerged, with some companies accusing AI developers of “data theft” and demanding payment or licensing agreements.

In 2024, several major media houses — including The New York Times — filed lawsuits against OpenAI and Microsoft for using their content without authorization. Similarly, artists and photographers have criticized image-generating AIs for learning from their works without acknowledgment or compensation. Wikipedia’s stance is less about copyright infringement (since its content is freely licensed) and more about fairness and sustainability in the digital ecosystem.

By joining this global conversation, Wikipedia is essentially asking AI companies to recognize the value of the infrastructure and the human effort behind freely available data. Unlike proprietary media, Wikipedia’s content is built and maintained by millions of volunteers worldwide. The foundation argues that the least AI companies can do is share a portion of their profits to help sustain the very platform that helps train their systems.

What Happens If AI Companies Refuse?

If tech giants decline to cooperate, Wikipedia might face a difficult choice. Restricting AI crawlers could help control operational costs, but it would also reduce the flow of information that AI tools provide to billions of users through search engines and chatbots. On the other hand, continuing the current model could mean Wikipedia’s resources are increasingly drained by entities that give nothing back.

The situation may push regulators and policymakers to step in. As AI becomes more central to global economies, governments are beginning to explore frameworks that define how data sources are accessed, licensed, and compensated. Wikipedia’s demand could serve as a test case for how open data platforms and AI companies can coexist ethically and sustainably.

The Beginning of a New Digital Ethic

Wikipedia’s appeal to Google, OpenAI, and others is not merely a financial request — it’s a moral and philosophical one. It raises essential questions: Who owns knowledge? Should open data automatically mean free labor for corporate algorithms? And how can we preserve public goods in a world increasingly shaped by private AI systems?

Wales’ statement may signal the beginning of a new digital ethic — one where transparency, fairness, and shared responsibility become the guiding principles of the AI era. If Wikipedia succeeds in creating a model where AI companies contribute financially to the platforms that educate their algorithms, it could inspire similar arrangements across the web, from online forums to academic databases.