Schools Adapt to the Rising Use of AI in Student Assignments

In partnership with

How much could AI save your support team?

Peak season is here. Most retail and ecommerce teams face the same problem: volume spikes, but headcount doesn't.

Instead of hiring temporary staff or burning out your team, there’s a smarter move. Let AI handle the predictable stuff, like answering FAQs, routing tickets, and processing returns, so your people focus on what they do best: building loyalty.

Gladly’s ROI calculator shows exactly what this looks like for your business: how many tickets AI could resolve, how much that costs, and what that means for your bottom line. Real numbers. Your data.

See your savings

The sudden appearance of neatly written essays, flawless answers, and unusually fast homework submissions has caught the attention of teachers across schools in Lucknow. What initially looked like a welcome improvement in discipline and academic performance soon revealed a deeper transformation taking place inside classrooms—the growing and often invisible influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on student learning.

With free and easily accessible AI-powered tools available online, students are increasingly turning to technology to complete assignments, draft essays, and solve academic problems. While these tools promise efficiency and convenience, they also raise serious questions about learning authenticity, academic honesty, and conceptual understanding. As a result, schools are now rethinking traditional teaching and assessment methods to respond to this rapidly evolving challenge.

The Illusion of Perfection

Teachers report that many AI-assisted assignments appear impressive on the surface. The language is polished, answers are error-free, and submissions are timely. However, beneath this apparent perfection lies a troubling concern: the work often does not reflect the student’s true understanding of the subject.

“A beautifully written essay may still have gaps in reasoning, and flawless problem-solving can hide weak conceptual clarity,” said Shalini Nigam, a teacher at a private school in Lucknow. According to her, this growing mismatch between written performance and actual comprehension has forced educators to look beyond the final output and examine the learning process itself.

To address this issue, schools have begun using AI-detection and plagiarism-checking tools such as Turnitin. These tools help identify machine-generated content and copied material. However, teachers stress that technology alone cannot solve the problem. The real goal, they say, is to ensure students genuinely learn rather than merely submitting perfect-looking assignments.

Training Teachers for the AI Era

Recognizing that AI is here to stay, several schools have shifted focus from resistance to adaptation. Instead of banning AI outright, institutions are training teachers to understand how these tools work, how to integrate them responsibly into lesson planning, and how to identify signs of misuse.

“Technology is unavoidable in modern education,” said Atharv Mehra, head of academics at a private school. “The aim is not to prohibit AI, but to guide students toward ethical and responsible use. Teachers are being trained to spot red flags, redesign assessments, and encourage critical thinking alongside technological support.”

Workshops and training programs now help educators use AI for curriculum design, assessment planning, and personalized learning strategies. This approach acknowledges AI as a powerful educational aid while reinforcing the importance of human judgment and classroom interaction.

Classroom Interaction as the Real Test

Despite the rise of AI detection software, teachers agree that the most reliable method of assessing student understanding remains direct interaction. Oral tests, classroom discussions, and spontaneous questioning often reveal whether a student truly grasps the subject.

“A sudden jump in marks without corresponding conceptual clarity is easy to spot,” said Shazia Begum, a teacher. “During discussions, students sometimes struggle to explain their own answers. That’s when it becomes clear that AI may have done the thinking for them.”

Such moments highlight a key limitation of AI-generated work—it can produce answers, but it cannot replace comprehension, curiosity, or the ability to explain ideas in one’s own words.

Rethinking Assignments for the Future

Education experts believe that the long-term solution lies in redesigning assignments themselves. Traditional essays and routine worksheets are especially vulnerable to AI misuse. To counter this, schools are being encouraged to adopt more reflective, creative, and application-based tasks.

“Assignments should push students to think beyond textbooks,” said education consultant Himanshu Pandey. “Project-based learning, reflective writing, real-world problem solving, and creative tasks make it harder to rely solely on AI. These methods encourage curiosity, originality, and deeper engagement.”

By asking students to apply concepts in new contexts or relate learning to personal experiences, educators can make assessments more meaningful and resistant to automation.

Balancing Innovation and Integrity

The rise of AI in education presents both an opportunity and a challenge. On one hand, AI can support learning by offering explanations, practice problems, and research assistance. On the other, unchecked dependence risks weakening critical thinking, originality, and academic integrity.

Schools in Lucknow—and across India—are now at a crossroads. The focus is shifting from simply detecting AI misuse to fostering a culture of ethical learning. By combining technology awareness, teacher training, redesigned assessments, and strong classroom engagement, schools aim to strike a balance between innovation and authenticity.