Indian CEO Sparks Controversy After Bullying Employee Over AI Use

In partnership with

Find out why 100K+ engineers read The Code twice a week

Staying behind on tech trends can be a career killer.

But let’s face it, no one has hours to spare every week trying to stay updated.

That’s why over 100,000 engineers at companies like Google, Meta, and Apple read The Code twice a week.

Here’s why it works:

• No fluff, just signal – Learn the most important tech news delivered in just two short emails.

• Supercharge your skills – Get access to top research papers and resources that give you an edge in the industry.

• See the future first – Discover what’s next before it hits the mainstream, so you can lead, not follow.

Join 100,000+ engineers who read The Code to stay ahead of the curve.

A recent Reddit post has set the internet abuzz after alleging that an Indian CEO bullied one of his top-performing employees for not using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in his work. The post has triggered intense debate across the global tech community about how AI is transforming workplaces—and at what cost to human employees.

The Allegation: Bullying in the Name of AI

According to the viral Reddit post, an Indian CEO of a tech company spent nearly two hours berating a top employee for refusing to adopt AI-driven tools the company had recently developed. The employee, reportedly an award-winning performer who had even referred the CEO to his current company, was allegedly humiliated during a call.

The Redditor who shared the story titled the post “AI Replacement is REAL.” In the post, the user claimed, “One of the award-winning top performers, who often interacted directly with the CEO, was bullied for two hours because he was not using the AI product that the CEO was aggressively promoting.”

The CEO, according to the account, had personally developed around 15–20 AI tools and was planning to use them to automate development tasks, potentially eliminating many human roles. The post further alleged that the CEO had already fired several senior developers, architects, and team leads, stating his intention to “replace mid and senior employees with interns and associates.”

A Reflection of Broader Industry Fears

While the identity of the CEO and company remains undisclosed, the post has reignited long-standing fears about automation and job security in the tech sector. The rapid adoption of generative AI, coding assistants, and machine learning algorithms has created a divide between those who embrace AI as a productivity enhancer and those who see it as a threat to their careers.

On Reddit, thousands of users weighed in. One user commented, “All these tech CEOs are in FOMO (fear of missing out). They think AI will cut costs and skyrocket profits. They don’t realize real-life engineering challenges. Once systems fail and there’s no one to fix them, reality will hit hard.”

Another user questioned the sustainability of AI-driven cost-cutting: “If AI is so easy and anyone can code now, where are all the revolutionary apps that were supposed to appear? Reality is different. These CEOs are gambling on hype.”

The Larger Trend: AI and Workplace Pressure

The alleged bullying case reflects a growing pressure among employees to adapt to AI-powered workflows. Many companies, especially in India’s competitive IT and startup sectors, are rapidly integrating AI into development, testing, and analytics operations. Those who fail to keep pace are sometimes viewed as “obsolete.”

AI tools are now performing tasks that once required skilled human developers—such as code generation, debugging, and documentation. While this has boosted efficiency, it has also raised ethical questions about fair employment, intellectual dependency on AI, and mental health issues caused by excessive automation pressure.

A technology analyst commented, “This case highlights a dangerous mindset—treating AI as a measure of loyalty rather than a tool of support. When CEOs bully employees for not using AI, it crosses the line from innovation to intimidation.”

AI’s Dual Nature: Promise and Peril

Artificial intelligence has undoubtedly become the backbone of modern software development. Companies like Microsoft, Google, and Meta have invested billions in AI integration across their products. However, this technological leap has created new hierarchies in the workplace—those who master AI tools are celebrated, while those who hesitate face marginalization.

The Reddit incident echoes similar reports from around the world where managers pressure employees to rely on AI even when it hampers creativity or judgment. Industry observers warn that such cases could increase as businesses race to stay competitive in an AI-driven economy.

Another Redditor remarked, “The irony is that AI is supposed to make our lives easier. But in reality, it’s becoming a tool for control and fear. Companies need to balance adoption with empathy.”

Social Media Reactions: Anger and Sympathy

The alleged incident sparked outrage on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and LinkedIn. Many professionals expressed empathy for the bullied employee, while others saw it as a sign of a deeper cultural shift in corporate leadership.

A tech blogger wrote, “We’re entering a dangerous phase where CEOs idolize AI more than human intelligence. When management starts seeing employees as replaceable algorithms, innovation dies.”

Some industry veterans, however, argued that adapting to AI is necessary. “Resistance to AI won’t help,” one user countered. “Employees must upskill, just like they did during the shift from manual coding to automation tools.”

A Broader Commentary on AI in India

India’s booming tech ecosystem, valued at over $250 billion, is among the fastest adopters of artificial intelligence. From software development and fintech to customer service and healthcare, AI solutions are rapidly transforming industries. Yet, as companies push for productivity, worker well-being often takes a back seat.

Experts believe the next challenge for Indian firms is to adopt ethical AI practices that combine automation with empathy. “AI can coexist with human talent,” said a Bengaluru-based startup mentor. “But leadership must understand that technology works best when humans feel valued—not threatened.”

Regulatory Silence and Ethical Questions

Despite growing incidents of AI-related workplace disputes, India currently lacks clear labor or ethical guidelines concerning AI-driven management practices. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has begun consultations on AI ethics, but enforcement mechanisms remain weak.

Legal experts say bullying an employee for not using a particular tool could constitute workplace harassment under India’s employment laws. However, proving such cases is difficult, especially when communications occur online or in private video calls.

The Future of Human Roles in AI-Driven Workplaces

As artificial intelligence reshapes the global workforce, the question remains: What roles will humans play in the age of automation?

According to a McKinsey report, up to 30% of current IT roles may be automated by 2030, but entirely new job categories will emerge—such as AI ethics officers, model auditors, and human-AI collaboration specialists.

The Reddit post serves as a stark reminder of this transitional phase. The balance between embracing AI and preserving human dignity is delicate—and how companies handle it could define the future of work for an entire generation.

Conclusion

The story of the Indian CEO allegedly bullying his employee is more than just an internet scandal—it is a warning about corporate ethics in the AI era. As businesses rush to harness artificial intelligence, they must remember that progress should not come at the cost of humanity. Machines can generate code, but only humans can create culture, empathy, and vision.